Which of the following statements about OCI Object Storage's redundancy is true?

The statement that data is stored redundantly across multiple availability domains is accurate when discussing OCI Object Storage's redundancy features. This design ensures that even in the event of a failure in one availability domain, your data remains accessible from another domain. Deploying redundancy across multiple availability domains enhances the durability and availability of data, which is a fundamental principle of cloud architecture. This means that the likelihood of data loss is significantly minimized, as copies of the data exist in different physical locations.

This approach is particularly valuable for mission-critical applications where continuous uptime and data accessibility are essential. By leveraging multiple availability domains, OCI allows for a more resilient architecture that can endure various types of outages or disruptions, thereby ensuring better overall reliability for applications relying on Object Storage.

In contrast, storing data on a single physical server or within a single availability domain compromises data durability, as any issue affecting that server or domain could lead to data unavailability or loss. Furthermore, the assertion that data is not monitored for integrity contradicts OCI Object Storage's inherent features, which include mechanisms for data integrity checks and redundancy to ensure that stored data remains intact and retrievable.